000			02969nam a22002297a 4500
003			OSt
005			20240924145001.0
008			240215b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cCPGS
100			_aSoubam Hazarjit Singh _99914
245			_aEconomic analysis of poultry farming in Manipur / _cSoubam Hazarjit Singh.
260			_aUmiam: _bCPGSAS, CAU(I), _cJuly 2023.
300			_a61p. : _bill., col plates.; _c30cm.
440			_a[Agricultural Economics, School of Social Sciences] _99208
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
520			_aPoultry farming has emerged as one of the profitable and reliable industries. Poultry is an enterprise for feeding the world’s population, which is expanding quickly, as well as for supporting small farmers and landless people. The nation exported 320.24 thousand MT of chicken products to the world of total ₹529.81 crores during 2021-22. In North East Region (NER), Assam leads the egg production followed by Manipur and Meghalaya. Manipur is third among the NER in terms of chicken output, and fourth in terms of meat production. Manipur stands second in egg production in comparison with other NER. Imphal West valley district was selected from Manipur based on the highest poultry meat production accounting for 0.96 thousand tonnes. Therefore, under this backdrop, the following research objectives has been formulated: (1) To work out the costs and returns of poultry. (2) To study the disposal pattern of poultry products in Manipur. The study was carried out in Lamshang and Wangoi blocks of Imphal West districts in which a total of 104 samples were collected randomly from the villages which was selected purposively based on the highest number of poultry farmers. The samples were divided into category-I (broiler) and category-II (kuroiler). To achieve the abovementioned objectives, analytical tools like standard techniques to work out the costs and returns, marketing cost, marketable surplus, etc., were calculated in which total variable cost for category-I was found higher compared to category-II with ₹372760.83 and ₹31941.93 per cycle respectively. On the other hand, the total fixed cost for category-I was found higher compared to category- II with ₹246006.89 and ₹8331.56 per cycle, respectively. The net return was found higher in category-I compared to category-II with ₹122850.77 and ₹15695.26 per cycle, respectively. From the study it was concluded that a quality locally available low-cost feed should be promoted to reduce the cost of poultry feed in order to enhance their income and also standardization of the different marketing cost to enhance the efficiency of the existing marketing channels in the market.
650			_aPoultry farming _xEconomic aspect. _99915
650			_aPoultry farming _xCost analysis. _99916
700			_aRam Singh _eMajor advisor.
856			_uhttps://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810206845 _yOnline
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c5577 _d5577